SMSF Advice Hub

Login

Join

All The Self-Managed Superannuation Advice You’ll Ever Need

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Resources
    • How To Set Up an SMSF
      • [Member] Better ways to setup your fund
    • Contributions
      • Employer Contributions
      • Member Contributions
      • Contribution Limits (Caps) & Excess Contributions Tax
    • Taxation on SMSFs
      • Contributions Tax
      • Tax on Income (0%, 10% or 15%)
    • Benefits – getting your money
      • Preservation – “Hands Off!”
      • Lump sum withdrawals
      • Income Streams (Account based pensions)
  • Ask A Question
  • Members
    • Join
  • Contact

A Corporate Trustee is Much Needed for SMSF Succession

By: Alan Preston   •   12 January, 2015

corporate trusteeSmooth and seamless succession for a Self-managed Super Fund is quite possible. For some time, the industry has played around with many styles of doing so, but presently, we can say with a fair degree of conviction that we are there and that it can be done effectively. Before anything else, it is significant to have your estate planning in line with your SMSF succession.

SMSF succession

A sole purpose corporate trustee, by a consensus, is a better bet than having too many individual members when it comes down to SMSF succession. The ATO penalty regime, effective from 1st July 2014, means that for the slightest contravention, having individual members would result in number of members multiplied by the penalty amount. It is not tough to understand how a corporate trustee can reduce the amount of penalty by a fair degree.

Related party contraventions

Even for arm’s length transactions and related party contraventions, the dice is heavily loaded in favour of corporate trustees rather than individual members for a SMSF.

The famous case study

There is the famous Katz versus Grossman case to refer to when we look into the need for corporate trustees. In this particular case, one of the two siblings was appointed as a co-trustee on the mother’s demise to comply with the regulation and subsequently, the sibling used the binding death nomination clause in the event of the father’s death to use all the death benefit for herself. This situation could so easily have been avoided had there been a corporate trustee in place.

Related Posts

Corporate trustees Are a Guard Against Stiff Penalties
Corporate trustees Are a Guard Against Stiff Penalties
BDBN Is Not the Last Word On Succession Planning
BDBN Is Not the Last Word On Succession Planning
Practical Tips on Setting Up SMSF
Practical Tips on Setting Up SMSF
Rigidity of Binding Death Benefit Nomination Can Prove Costly
Rigidity of Binding Death Benefit Nomination Can Prove Costly

Ask Our SMSF Experts

  • ask our SMSF experts
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular Posts

  • Retiring Overseas: How $A 1,800 Can Buy You A Life Of Luxury
  • Centrelink Reverse Mortgage Scheme: As Puzzling As Egyptian Hieroglyphs
  • smsf advice hub blue chip shares Why SMSF Investors Should Fall In Love With Blue-Chip Shares
  • managing SMSF Busting The Myth: Managing SMSF is Time-Consuming
  • smsf advice hub super guarantee compliance Ensure Your Super Guarantee Payments Are Compliant

Topics

insurance investing your money managing a super fund properties retirement funding retirement planning self-managed super fund compliance SMSF borrowing SMSF news super contributions super fund benefits super fund rules Super investment tax savings

SMSF Advice Newsletter

Receive the latest super fund news as it happens and stay up to date with your SMSF

Copyright © 2025 by SMSF Advice Hub. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Connect with us on