SMSF Advice Hub

Login

Join

All The Self-Managed Superannuation Advice You’ll Ever Need

  • Home
  • About
  • News
  • Resources
    • How To Set Up an SMSF
      • [Member] Better ways to setup your fund
    • Contributions
      • Employer Contributions
      • Member Contributions
      • Contribution Limits (Caps) & Excess Contributions Tax
    • Taxation on SMSFs
      • Contributions Tax
      • Tax on Income (0%, 10% or 15%)
    • Benefits – getting your money
      • Preservation – “Hands Off!”
      • Lump sum withdrawals
      • Income Streams (Account based pensions)
  • Ask A Question
  • Members
    • Join
  • Contact

What You Need to Know about SMSF Lending

By: Alan Preston   •   27 January, 2015

SMSF borrowingThe Financial System Inquiry (FSI) Report has made a few recommendations and the SMSF industry, one can say with conviction, is not all too happy with them. If Campbell Report in 1981 deregulated the financial market and Wallis report led to the setting up of APRA and ASIC in 1997, the FSI Report about SMSF lending may have the industry rushing for cover.

Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements

There is a definite push towards banning Limited Recourse Borrowing Arrangements (LRBAs). The FSI believes that the playing field is far from level and that the SMSFs can use leveraging to gain access to the residential properties in a low-tax environment in a way their traditional peers may not even dream of.

Undeserved leverage, shouts FSI

In fact, this kind of leverage has given birth to a substantial amount of borrowings via SMSF, feels the FSI. The trend, the FSI fears, may end up encroaching on the economic fundamentals. What perhaps remains to be answered by the report is the fact that residential investments make for a mere 3.5% of total SMSF assets and how this mini pool can disturb the equilibrium of the economy.

Yes, there is a valid counterpoint. The percentage of residential real estate investment through SMSFs may still be miniscule, but the number of investors indulging in it has increased roughly 1800% since the last 5 years. At this rate, the figure ‘3.5%’ may not remain so for long.

LRBA should stay

To me, LRBAs should stay. The power of leverage cannot be substituted quite as well, and it may even be a deep need of the economy, a point that the FSI report is missing. All we have to be aware of is the presence of spruikers who are pushing SMSF trustees into rogue sales for their own commission and comfort.

Related Posts

What ATO’s SMSF Statistics Point At?
What ATO’s SMSF Statistics Point At?
How SMSF Lending Breaches the Law
How SMSF Lending Breaches the Law
SMSF Guidelines for Limited Recourse Borrowing
SMSF Guidelines for Limited Recourse Borrowing
APRA Reduces Lending Limits
APRA Reduces Lending Limits

Ask Our SMSF Experts

  • ask our SMSF experts
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Most Popular Posts

  • Retiring Overseas: How $A 1,800 Can Buy You A Life Of Luxury
  • Centrelink Reverse Mortgage Scheme: As Puzzling As Egyptian Hieroglyphs
  • smsf advice hub blue chip shares Why SMSF Investors Should Fall In Love With Blue-Chip Shares
  • managing SMSF Busting The Myth: Managing SMSF is Time-Consuming
  • smsf advice hub super guarantee compliance Ensure Your Super Guarantee Payments Are Compliant

Topics

insurance investing your money managing a super fund properties retirement funding retirement planning self-managed super fund compliance SMSF borrowing SMSF news super contributions super fund benefits super fund rules Super investment tax savings

SMSF Advice Newsletter

Receive the latest super fund news as it happens and stay up to date with your SMSF

Copyright © 2025 by SMSF Advice Hub. All Rights Reserved.

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Connect with us on